GEO by Engine
Compare retrieval, citation, and access rules to set investment priorities.
- Best for
- SEO leads, growth marketers, GEO consultants.
- Before you start
- GEO 101 Steps 1–4.
- By the end
- You can prioritize engines and separate shared work from engine-specific work.
- Mapping the engines: what varies, what doesn't
Use the answer loop as a common map, then compare how engines differ in retrieval, source selection, attribution, and crawler control.
Time: 10 min
- ChatGPT Search
Separate ChatGPT's training and search crawlers, then examine when web retrieval occurs and how citations appear when Search uses external sources.
Time: 12 min
- Perplexity
Study a citation-forward answer engine with visible source links, then use that observability to design careful comparisons across query and product modes.
Time: 12 min
- Google AI Overviews & Gemini
Compare AI Overviews and Gemini on the Google stack, focusing on when retrieval occurs and how Googlebot and Google-Extended apply to different uses.
Time: 15 min
- Claude & Bing Copilot
Evaluate Claude and Bing Copilot by audience fit, retrieval context, and existing platform dependencies rather than treating either as a default priority.
Time: 10 min
- AI engines in China
For audiences in China, evaluate Baidu, Doubao, Kimi, and DeepSeek on their own retrieval, source-display, access, and publishing conditions.
Time: 15 min
- Cross-engine synthesis
Separate shared foundations from engine-specific refinements, then use maturity and audience evidence to decide which differences deserve dedicated work.
Time: 20 min